data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12d97/12d97c1eebb42ce62848bc48c78e8ed8855d0cb1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/530d8/530d84ed6319138241908ff454852d53df5619ff" alt=""
-The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle, Haruki Murakami
question numbah one...& a half: which camera do you use?...what's your preference?
i have a couple different cameras in my arsenal. my first digital camera was an olympus d-560 zoom. yeah, i know. it's practically medieval nowadays. then, i was gifted with a nikon d40 for my birthday when it first came out. but the most recent addition is my beloved nikon coolpix l18; i use it most of the time- actually the majority of my pictures on the blog were taken with it. i love it that much!
when you say preference, i would rather much work with lomography. goodness, i love the distortion, the saturation and natural filters of lomographic cameras. at the moment, i own a frog-eye and an old holga. because of how lazy i am to get things developed, i kind of lag on my lomography. but it still remains my favorite. if you aren't particularly acquainted with lomography, take a gander here. or here. especially here.
i'm also fortunate enough to own a polaroid but because of the recent hiatus of their production and the fact that the film was selling for such hefty prices on ebay, i kinda stopped with those too. thank goodness they've continued with the production. suffice it to say, i went digital. it's just so much more expedient & there are less consequences when it comes to money since everything is "reusable". i can make so many more trial & error experiments and that kind of thing.
with that said, i absolutely don't advocate the idea that skill comes with the quantity of cameras or "fanciness" of the camera one uses. i think true development as a photographer comes with the passion a person has. i mean, i'd rather use the coolpix instead of the d40 because its sensitivity to light & movement creates cool effects- & well, it's smaller to boot. not to say that i don't like the d40, the resolution is fantastic! but the coolpix just suits my personality & style a little bit better. no matter how accessorized a person's d200 is, their pictures can still be a mess- just a higher resolution mess. good pictures don't come from a box filled with expensive equipment, they come from the heart. some of my most admired photographers have taken their pictures with one-time use cameras. i think that's just incredible. nevertheless, whatever you prefer should reflect your own brand of originality. but hey, that's just me philosophising, you don't have to agree.
& so now i'd like to ask you guys which camera do you use? style preference?
if there are any other questions, don't hesitate to ask :D
also, thanks for the book suggestions. i've looked them up, & they seem interesting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ed08/1ed08e01c6af0ba828e2d59b1e5bba28410e429f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d3ac/9d3acd232bc053e34f6de74592b0b456433fe922" alt=""
Oooooh I love that elephant! It's so soft and beautiful...
ReplyDeleteThat's a nice post ! I totally agree that it's not the money you spend in a camera that makes you a good photographer ! I got a Nikon reflex too but I'd love to own a polaroid & an holga.. Lomography is one of my favourite style :)
ReplyDelete